TWiV 1182: Clinical update with Dr. Daniel Griffin

January 11, 2025

In his weekly clinical update, Dr. Griffin discusses how vaccination and vaccine hesitancy affects public health and disease spread in terms of mpox, the first human death from H5N1 in US, why one should not feed their pets raw pet food and the metapneumonia outbreak in China before reviewing the recent statistics on RSV, influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infections, the WasterwaterScan dashboard, where to find PEMGARDA, how nirmatrelvir-ritonavir/Paxlovid reduces adverse outcomes of COVID in patients with kidney disease, provides information for Columbia University Irving Medical Center’s long COVID treatment center, SARS-CoV-2 infection affects skin conditions including shingles and if long antiviral treatment affects long COVID.

Click arrow to play
Download TWiV 1182 (19 MB .mp3, 31 min)
Subscribe (free): Apple Podcasts, RSSemail

Become a patron of TWiV!

Links for this episode

Intro music is by Ronald Jenkees

Send your questions for Dr. Griffin to daniel@microbe.tv

The post TWiV 1182: Clinical update with Dr. Daniel Griffin first appeared on This Week in Virology.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0 comments on “TWiV 1182: Clinical update with Dr. Daniel Griffin

  1. @John writes. True.
    Like your sources! Share mine:

    His latest opinion on the risk assesments, quote:
    Fouchier questioned whether the government’s current effort to weight the benefits and risks of this kind of research is going to provide any new insights that haven’t already been discussed over the last three years since the debate over his experiments first began. “I think that the quantitative risk and benefit analysis is going to be close to impossible,” Fouchier told NPR. “Whatever the numbers are they come up with, in the end it will still be a judgment call by someone, somewhere.”.
    http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/12/18/371686933/nih-allows-restart-of-mers-research-that-was-deemed-too-risky

    To deal with all uncertainties in a scientific way this should show up as a large error margin.
    http://www.saburchill.com/IBbiology/sci_invest/007.html

    Lipsitch & Inglesby: There is no rigorous, objective, credible risk assessment process to judge the risks and benefits of proceeding with it. We believe that the responsible course is to take a research pause until such a risk assessment process is established, which creates a stronger basis for decisions and actions.
    http://mbio.asm.org/content/5/6/e02366-14.full

    The European Commission is also evaluating the risks of synthetic biology again, contributions still welcome:
    http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consultations/public_consultations/scenihr_consultation_26_en.htm

    Throws down the gauntlet, states: Flu experiments cause 2,000 to 1,400,000 deaths per year.
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2015/01/12/flu-experiments-may-cause-2000-deaths-per-year/